2006 Acura TL vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX

To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2006 Acura TL. (258 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura TL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 905 kg more than 2006 Acura TL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura TL. (316 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura TL. 2013 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 2006 Acura TL has manual transmission. 2006 Acura TL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Acura TL 2013 Cadillac SRX
Make Acura Cadillac
Model TL SRX
Year Released 2006 2013
Body Type Sedan Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3212 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 258 HP 304 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 316 Nm 359 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 11.5
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 2480 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4834 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1669 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2807 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.1 L/100km 9.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.8 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 80 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]