2006 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 (149 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 845 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 (181 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Alfa Romeo 156 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Zastava |
Model | 156 | 102 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2160 mm |