2006 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2004 MCC Silverpulse
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Silverpulse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Silverpulse would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 MCC Silverpulse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MCC Silverpulse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2004 MCC Silverpulse | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | MCC |
Model | 156 | Silverpulse |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1970 cc | 699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |