2006 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Alfa Romeo 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 285 kg more than 2012 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Alfa Romeo 156. (181 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Alfa Romeo 156.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Alfa Romeo 156 2012 Mazda 3
Make Alfa Romeo Mazda
Model 156 3
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1970 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 181 Nm 183 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1585 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 55 L