2006 Alfa Romeo 159 vs. 1952 Austin Princess
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 (260 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1952 Austin Princess. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin Princess.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 (322 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Austin Princess. (251 Nm). This means 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Austin Princess.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 | 1952 Austin Princess | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
| Model | 159 | Princess |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3200 cc | 3993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 322 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1900 mm |
