2006 Alfa Romeo 159 vs. 1952 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 (260 HP) has 249 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (11 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Alfa Romeo 159. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 (322 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 | 1952 Citroen 2CV | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Citroen |
| Model | 159 | 2CV |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3200 cc | 375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 11 HP |
| Torque | 322 Nm | 22 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
