2006 Alfa Romeo 159 vs. 1965 Austin A 40
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 (260 HP) has 213 more horse power than 1965 Austin A 40. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 should accelerate faster than 1965 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 (322 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Austin A 40. (81 Nm). This means 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 | 1965 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
| Model | 159 | A 40 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3200 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 47 HP |
| Torque | 322 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1520 mm |
