2006 Alfa Romeo 159 vs. 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 | 1982 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
| Model | 159 | Monte Carlo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 182 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2750 mm |
