2006 Alfa Romeo 159 vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 (260 HP) has 190 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Because 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Alfa Romeo 159. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 (322 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm). This means 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 | 1982 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
| Model | 159 | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3200 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 322 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1680 mm |
