2006 Alfa Romeo 159 vs. 1983 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 (260 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Eldorado. (133 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Alfa Romeo 159. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 (322 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Cadillac Eldorado. (270 Nm). This means 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Cadillac Eldorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alfa Romeo 159 | 1983 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 159 | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3200 cc | 4080 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 133 HP |
| Torque | 322 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
