2006 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1950 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 167 kg more than 2006 Alfa Romeo 166.
Because 1950 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1950 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 166 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2959 cc | 5425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1752 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3210 mm |
