2006 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1952 Porsche 356
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Porsche 356. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Porsche 356 would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 815 kg more than 1952 Porsche 356.
Because 1952 Porsche 356 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Porsche 356. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1952 Porsche 356 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Porsche |
Model | 166 | 356 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2387 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 79 L |