2006 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 (238 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 460 kg more than 2006 Alfa Romeo 166.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 166 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 79 L |
