2006 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 (238 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 505 kg more than 2006 Alfa Romeo 166.
Because 1964 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | 166 | Sixty |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 7027 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 79 L |