2006 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Alfa Romeo 166. (289 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Alfa Romeo 166.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | 166 | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 238 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 289 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
