2006 Alfa Romeo 166 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 (217 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 (265 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Alfa Romeo 166 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Alfa Romeo 166 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 166 | CU-X |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2959 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 265 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 69 L | 80 L |