2006 Alfa Romeo Brera vs. 1997 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo Brera is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo Brera (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1997 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo Brera should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercury Villager.
Because 2006 Alfa Romeo Brera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Alfa Romeo Brera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alfa Romeo Brera | 1997 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercury |
| Model | Brera | Villager |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2398 cc | 2960 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1910 mm |
