2006 Alfa Romeo Spider vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Alfa Romeo Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Alfa Romeo Spider would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (237 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2006 Alfa Romeo Spider. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2006 Alfa Romeo Spider.
Because 2006 Alfa Romeo Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Alfa Romeo Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Alfa Romeo Spider has automatic transmission and 2013 Volvo XC60 has manual transmission. 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Alfa Romeo Spider will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Alfa Romeo Spider | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | Spider | XC60 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1891 mm |