2006 Alpina B3 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2006 Alpina B3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 3,347 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Alpina B3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alpina B3 (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alpina B3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Alpina B3 weights approximately 317 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alpina B3 (363 Nm) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2006 Alpina B3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Alpina B3 | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | B3 | TS-50 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3347 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 363 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1525 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 132 L |