2006 Alpina B5 vs. 1964 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2006 Alpina B5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alpina B5 (492 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alpina B5 should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac Sixty.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Alpina B5 | 1964 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Alpina | Cadillac |
| Model | B5 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 7027 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 492 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
