2006 Alpina B5 vs. 2002 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2006 Alpina B5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Alpina B5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alpina B5 (492 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 339 more horse power than 2002 Mercury Sable. (153 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alpina B5 should accelerate faster than 2002 Mercury Sable.

Because 2006 Alpina B5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Alpina B5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alpina B5 (701 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2006 Alpina B5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mercury Sable.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Alpina B5 2002 Mercury Sable
Make Alpina Mercury
Model B5 Sable
Year Released 2006 2002
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4398 cc 2986 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 492 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4900 RPM
Torque 701 Nm 251 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 3950 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 6 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 5030 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 3000 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 85 L