2006 Alpina B5 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Alpina B5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Alpina B5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alpina B5 (492 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 295 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alpina B5 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alpina B5 (701 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Alpina B5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Alpina B5 | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Alpina | Ford |
Model | B5 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 492 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 701 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3510 mm |