2006 Alpina B5 vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Alpina B5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Alpina B5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alpina B5 (492 HP) has 210 more horse power than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alpina B5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Alpina B5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Alpina B5 (701 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover. (441 Nm). This means 2006 Alpina B5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Land Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Alpina B5 | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Alpina | Land Rover |
Model | B5 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 492 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 701 Nm | 441 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |