2006 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1956 Austin A 35
To start off, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 (449 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 415 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 35.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 (570 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Aston Martin DB9 | 1956 Austin A 35 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Austin |
Model | DB9 | A 35 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 449 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.1 mm | 62.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 76.2 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 26 L |