2006 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Aston Martin DB9 | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Aston Martin | Oldsmobile |
Model | DB9 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 2259 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 449 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |