2006 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 2000 Toyota Caserta
To start off, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Caserta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Caserta would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 (449 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 378 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (71 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Caserta.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 (570 Nm) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Caserta. (140 Nm). This means 2006 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Caserta. 2000 Toyota Caserta has automatic transmission and 2006 Aston Martin DB9 has manual transmission. 2006 Aston Martin DB9 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Toyota Caserta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Aston Martin DB9 | 2000 Toyota Caserta | |
Make | Aston Martin | Toyota |
Model | DB9 | Caserta |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 449 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 140 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 55 L |