2006 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 (449 HP) has 379 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Aston Martin DB9 (570 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 468 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Aston Martin DB9 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Aston Martin | MCC |
| Model | DB9 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 5935 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 449 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 1810 mm |
