2006 Aston Martin DB9 vs. 2012 Opel Ampera
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Aston Martin DB9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Aston Martin DB9 would be higher.
Because 2006 Aston Martin DB9 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Aston Martin DB9. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Ampera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Aston Martin DB9 | 2012 Opel Ampera | |
| Make | Aston Martin | Opel |
| Model | DB9 | Ampera |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 449 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 35 L |
