2006 Audi A3 vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (200 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Jeep CJ2A.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | A3 | CJ2A |
Year Released | 2006 | 1949 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 281 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |