2006 Audi A3 vs. 1952 Buick 40
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 225 kg more than 2006 Audi A3.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A3. (280 Nm). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1952 Buick 40 | |
Make | Audi | Buick |
Model | A3 | 40 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 4066 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 292 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 78.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3090 mm |