2006 Audi A3 vs. 1956 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1956 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1956 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 378 kg more than 1956 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Maserati A6G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Maserati A6G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1956 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Audi | Maserati |
Model | A3 | A6G |
Year Released | 2006 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3189 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2560 mm |