2006 Audi A3 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | A3 | Master RR |
Year Released | 2006 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 40 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 75 L |