2006 Audi A3 vs. 1963 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 920 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1963 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A3 | Taunus |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 111 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 31 L |