2006 Audi A3 vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. (163 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Audi | Sunbeam |
Model | A3 | Tiger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4261 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 27 L |