2006 Audi A3 vs. 1968 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Audi A3. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 905 kg more than 2006 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1968 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A3 | Brougham |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1947 cc | 7734 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 229 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 79 L |