2006 Audi A3 vs. 1969 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 165 kg more than 2006 Audi A3.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A3 | 1969 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | A3 | 240 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1947 cc | 2483 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 131 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 54 L |
