2006 Audi A3 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (250 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (110 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Because 2006 Audi A3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | A3 | Biscayne |
Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 87 L |