2006 Audi A3 vs. 1979 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1979 Mercury Cougar. (134 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1979 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 580 kg more than 2006 Audi A3.

Because 1979 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mercury Cougar (336 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A3. (280 Nm). This means 1979 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A3.

Compare all specifications: