2006 Audi A3 vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 260. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 260. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2006 Audi A3.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (140 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Audi | Volvo |
Model | A3 | 260 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1947 cc | 2383 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 140 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 23.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |