2006 Audi A3 vs. 1982 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,982 cc, 2006 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Fiat Ritmo. (86 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1982 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Audi | Fiat |
Model | A3 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1116 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 86 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |