2006 Audi A3 vs. 1982 Holden Camira

To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1982 Holden Camira. (86 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1982 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Holden Camira. (125 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Holden Camira.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Audi A3 1982 Holden Camira
Make Audi Holden
Model A3 Camira
Year Released 2006 1982
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1968 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 138 HP 86 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 125 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 3800 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1380 kg 1040 kg
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2580 mm