2006 Audi A3 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (129 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (180 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A3 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Audi | Fiat |
| Model | A3 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1947 cc | 1995 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 129 HP |
| Torque | 280 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
