2006 Audi A3 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 1986 Caterham 1700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Caterham 1700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A3 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | A3 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 209 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 36 L |
