2006 Audi A3 vs. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A3 | 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | A3 | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1987 |
| Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1451 cc |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |
