2006 Audi A3 vs. 1999 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2006 Audi A3. (247 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2006 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 518 kg more than 1999 Dodge Charger.
Because 1999 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 1999 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Audi | Dodge |
Model | A3 | Charger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3188 cc | 4700 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1362 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 4760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |