2006 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 915 kg more than 2006 Audi A3.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi A3. (280 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi A3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A3 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 4195 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 338 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |