2006 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Equator. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Equator would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 172 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (320 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator. 2000 Ford Equator has automatic transmission and 2006 Audi A3 has manual transmission. 2006 Audi A3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | A3 | Equator |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 1787 cc |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 160 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3260 mm |