2006 Audi A3 vs. 2002 Tata E

To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Tata E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Tata E would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2002 Tata E. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2002 Tata E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Tata E. (210 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Tata E.

Compare all specifications: