2006 Audi A3 vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia K2700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia K2700 would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 20 kg more than 2006 Audi A3.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (281 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Audi | Kia |
Model | A3 | K2700 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 281 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.7 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |