2006 Audi A3 vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B3000. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 208 kg more than 2006 Audi A3.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A3 (280 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda B3000. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Audi A3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A3 | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | A3 | B3000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1947 cc | 2966 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 280 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 62 L |